I have to correct Tech here a bit. This statement is not correct
"No. Unlike speedlites that use the capacitors as a "resivoir" that starts as full then dumps what it needs, leaving more energy for the next burst, Einstein fills to what it needs, then dumps."Actually, Einstein does just what a speedlight does . . . the capacitors are fully charged and when either is flashed at reduced power, only the amount of charge needed is used and the rest remains.
So, indeed, if you set Einstein to 160WS and flash, 3/4 of the initial charge remains and you can immediately take a second shot. So you can shoot four immediately consecutive flashes with the light set at 1/4 power.
However, with either speedlight or Einstein, doing this will result in a slight lowering of exposure during the progression of the four flashes because the processor determines the power of each flash by the length of the resulting pulse. Since the capacitor voltage in this scenario is dropping with each flash, but the time is the same for each flash, the exposure value progressively falls.
How much exposure change you will get depends on the firing rate and power setting. Remember, the capacitors are being recharged during the progression, and they recharge faster than a typical speedlight. For instance, the recycle time at 1/5 power (128WS)  is about 1/3 second, thus you could fire at 3fps all day long with no exposure change from to flash. But at 5fps you would see some progressive exposure loss. At 8 FPS you would seem more exposure loss from the first flash to the last.
At 80WS the recycle time is about .21 seconds, so you could shoot at 5FPS with little if any exposure loss. If you shot at 80WS at 8FPS you would get pretty good results for a burst of 6 or 8 flashes. By dropping to 40WS you could shoot long bursts of 8FPS shots with little if any shot to shot exposure change.
An excellent example 10FPS strobing at 20WS can be seen in Rob Galbraith blog at this link:
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_ ... 0053-10715