|
Yes, as Tech Support says, you can use a MultiMax setup with the Einsteins. They're just "triggers", all they do is fire the flash, so I'd suggest getting "control" system, too, something that can control the power of the lights. Personally, I'd go with a Cyber Commander and CSXCV modules for the Einsteins. But I really, really, really question the use of the MultiMax system, at all. It's a very specialized setup, with features for banking lights, sequencing them, alternating them, and fine tuning sync delays in thousandths of a second. I'm trying to picture a class in which I'd use those features, and I've taught product, macro, portrait, special effects, and high speed photography. Basically, you can spend 1/3 the price of the Multimax gear on Paul Buff gear and get a more versatile system. (really. MultiMax $295 x 3 = $885. Paul Buff Cyber Commander $180 + CSXCV $30 x 2 + CST $60 = $300).
Talk to the professor. Unless there's some specific MultiMax things that he's going to be teaching, it's just not the right system. Even if there's a valid reason to stay with the Quantum gear (more on that in a second), there's a Quantum remote system that gives you power control of the T5D-R, as well as remote TTL automatic flash. There's also a Pocket Wizard system, TT5, that can both trigger and control power on an Einstein and (I believe) control power and do TTL auto on a T5D-R.
Can I ask what school and what class?
Personally, I think that list is just plain insane. If it's a list of what the school already has available in their studio for students to use, that's one thing. It's a moderately versatile setup that can do a big event job (a wedding or party), a location portrait job (in a corporate office or in someone's home), or a small studio job (formal portraits, model comp card, etc).
But if it's what they recommend that you purchase, for your own use, and for this class, it's a waste of about $3,000. It's the ultimate in the "one-size-fits-all" approach to photography. It may "fit all", but it doesn't "fit well".
The "Speedlights on steroids" description of the T5D-R heads is pretty much spot on. They're bigger, heavier versions of an on-camera "speedlight" flash like a Nikon SB-900 or Canon 580-II. The Quantum is 150 W-s, about 2-3x the energy of a speedlight, but only about 1/4 the energy of an Einstein. It's about the biggest thing you'd want to stick on your camera, or on a bracket that you'd hold in your hands. It's a great flash, if you plan on specializing in event photography. If I shot 50 weddings a year, I'd buy three of them.
But not if I had to do a wide range of jobs. In the studio, the T5D-R is marginal, at best. It has no modeling light. A studio strobe has a light, between 100 and 300W, that shines on your subject and helps you aim and adjust your lights, see where the shadows are falling, adjust your barn doors and gobos to screen out undesirable shadows and reflections. The Quantum doesn't have that. And it has a very lightweight reflector attachment system. In order to put a decent sized soft box on it, you have to resort to complex brackets that hold both the flash and the soft box in proper relation to each other. Cumbersome, fragile, and hard to use.
I own two entirely separate systems. I have my studio lights (A mix of Einsteins and 20 year old White Lightnings, controlled by a Cyber Commander) and my event lights (half a dozen Nikon SB-800 flashes). They each do their own thing, and do it well. No one-size-fits all. If it's kind of day when I need my charcoal gray suit and my favorite tie, I've got that, and if it's the kind for khakis, a tie-dye shirt, and my floppy bush hat with the kokopekli, I've got that, too.
The studio lights have strong stand mounts, soft box mounts, and good 250W modeling lights, as well as a ton more power than the Quantum. (I have one studio flash, an X3200, with 10 times the power of the Quantum). The event lights are lighter (I'll take that over the extra power of the Quantum when I'm in the field).
|