Paul C. Buff, Inc. Technical Forum

Technical Discussion Forum for all Paul C. Buff, Inc. Products

Login

Post a reply
 [ 6 posts ] 

Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:33 pm

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 7:29 pm
Posts: 14

I currently own 64 inch PLM and B800...

I cannot decide whether I should have 86 inch PLM with diffusing fabric
VS
30X60 soft box.

What would be different in the power output of 86 inch PLM + front diffusing fabric
VS 30X60 soft box??

What would be the difference in beam spread?


Many thanks in advance.
Dkim




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:54 pm

Site Admin
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:43 am
Posts: 5266

We are in the process of retesting all components. With a cover on, you would probably get a wider spread from the PLM than softbox (mostly because it is bigger than the softbox). With that in mind, more spread, the less light falling on any one point. We do not have a revised PLM to give any absolute measurements right now, but this information will be available one it is compiled.




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:09 pm

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:40 pm
Posts: 7

Technical Support wrote:
We are in the process of retesting all components. With a cover on, you would probably get a wider spread from the PLM than softbox (mostly because it is bigger than the softbox).
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The 86" arc PLM has 4,708 in² of reflective area.

An 86" arc PLM has a 27” radius so that when an White Front Diffuser Fabric is fitted, the Area of that Circle of now diffuser, not relector area is reduced to 2,290 in²!
The 86" arc PLM's diffuser area is 490 in² (21%) larger than the 30" x 60" Giant Softbox's 1,800 in².

Other factors are: how well light is transmitted by the Front Diffuser Fabrics of the two different modifiers, how evenly the light is distributed, and how much it is spread by them, all of which can only be know by testing.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With that in mind, more spread, the less light falling on any one point. We do not have a revised PLM to give any absolute measurements right now, but this information will be available one it is compiled.



Michael S. Rose
Columbia, MD




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:37 am

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:34 am
Posts: 55

Also, consider that the softbox has grid available.
This gives you much more control over spill.
I have Gen One 84" PLM and the diffuser. It offers nice broad light.
The softbox is much more controllable light relative to spill.
Given the attractive pricing, I have both.




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Mon Jul 26, 2010 11:55 am

Site Admin
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 10:43 am
Posts: 5266

A few minor corrections to the above math. The radius of the diffuser is 37.5" (the open face of the 86" PLM is 75") This makes the surface 4415 sq in. This makes the PLM about 2.5x more area, vs. 1.3x in the example above

Yes, the soft boxes can be gridded, where as PLM cannot, giving you more control. The PLM sans diffuser will give about the same beam spread as a gridded softbox (but will still be a broader light, as it is bigger than the softbox to start).




Top Top
Profile
 

#

Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:05 pm

Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:34 am
Posts: 55

Personally I like the light from the big PLM without the diffusion front.

With the front diffuser its a nice large soft source. Makes light similar to a window.

Naturally that's with the modifier close to the subject.




Top Top
Profile
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post a reply
 [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum